Due to weather conditions around Durham (UK), unfortunately Stephen Gorard wasn't able to come to Amsterdam. We hope to welcome him in the spring for a new AMCIS seminar.
Stephen Gorard illustrates the links between different ways of assessing disadvantage at school and subsequent qualification outcomes at age 16 in England.
Gorard's previous work has compared variables that represent current or recent snapshots of disadvantage - such as eligibility for FSM - with longer term summary variables, and found the latter to improve measures of both social segregation between schools and explanations of raw-score differences in attainment.
His new work takes an even more detailed longitudinal approach: modelling the course of one age cohort of 550,000 pupils from the National Pupil Database through their entire schooling to the age of sixteen, in 29 distinct analytical steps, using “effect” sizes, correlations, and a regression model.
The steps represent stages, such as what is known about each pupil when they were born, who they attended school with at age 10, and where they lived at age 14. The model also includes variables representing where data is missing for any pupil in any year.
Using capped Key Stage 4 points as an outcome measure, these stages can predict the outcome with R=0.90. This is considerably higher than for models using either snapshots or summaries of disadvantage. Key predictors are poverty and special educational needs at age 5. And throughout schooling, coupled with prior attainment at ages 6, 10, and 13.
With predictors fed into the model in life order, there is little evidence of differential progress for different language and ethnic minority groups, and no evidence of regional differences or a type of school effect.
Gorard concludes with the implications of these results for assessing disadvantage when considering school contexts, and for policy-makers. Given the small but apparently consistent negative school composition ‘effects’ in every year, one clear implication is that school intakes should be as mixed as possible both socially and academically.
Stephen Gorard is Professor of Education and Public Policy, and Fellow of the Wolfson Research Institute at Durham University. As well as Honorary Professorial Fellow at the University of Birmingham.
He is a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. His work concerns the robust evaluation of education as a lifelong process, focused on issues of equity and effectiveness. He is also a widely read and cited methodologist, involved in international and regional capacity-building activities, and used regularly as an adviser on the design of evaluations by central and local governments, NGOs and charities.